<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: TweetDeck stream of consciousness</title>
	<atom:link href="http://whitneyhess.com/blog/2008/07/14/tweetdeck-stream-of-consciousness/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://whitneyhess.com/blog/2008/07/14/tweetdeck-stream-of-consciousness/</link>
	<description>Improving the human experience one day at a time</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 00:24:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Club Penguin Cheats</title>
		<link>http://whitneyhess.com/blog/2008/07/14/tweetdeck-stream-of-consciousness/comment-page-1/#comment-4274</link>
		<dc:creator>Club Penguin Cheats</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Aug 2009 10:01:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whitneyhess.com/blog/?p=203#comment-4274</guid>
		<description>I agree with you on almost all counts. I&#039;ve been using TweetDeck exclusively for a week now, and haven&#039;t found many benefits over Twhirl. As you mention, having to now check multiple streams is a net loss in productivity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with you on almost all counts. I&#39;ve been using TweetDeck exclusively for a week now, and haven&#39;t found many benefits over Twhirl. As you mention, having to now check multiple streams is a net loss in productivity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bg</title>
		<link>http://whitneyhess.com/blog/2008/07/14/tweetdeck-stream-of-consciousness/comment-page-1/#comment-2779</link>
		<dc:creator>bg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 22:41:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whitneyhess.com/blog/?p=203#comment-2779</guid>
		<description>And to Alan’s point, I understand about following thousands, but in many ways, I like having a stream of thoughts in front of me. Many times I’ll pick up useful links or quotes from an unexpected source. I find it easier to do that when drawing form a larger pool of updates. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;(I track particular people at times to see what they’ve been saying, and usually, I know the regulars I follow can always be counted on to post something cool, so I have them to fall back on them if the general public lets me down.  ;-p</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And to Alan’s point, I understand about following thousands, but in many ways, I like having a stream of thoughts in front of me. Many times I’ll pick up useful links or quotes from an unexpected source. I find it easier to do that when drawing form a larger pool of updates. </p>
<p>(I track particular people at times to see what they’ve been saying, and usually, I know the regulars I follow can always be counted on to post something cool, so I have them to fall back on them if the general public lets me down.  ;-p</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bg</title>
		<link>http://whitneyhess.com/blog/2008/07/14/tweetdeck-stream-of-consciousness/comment-page-1/#comment-2778</link>
		<dc:creator>bg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 22:37:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whitneyhess.com/blog/?p=203#comment-2778</guid>
		<description>Agree.  ;-p  Late to the comment party, so here goes. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Seems like two issues at work, the quick-hit nature of a Twitter update and the apps used to scan them all.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Tiwtter by it’s nature forces changes in the way people write about what they think. At times, it’s great, at others, shorthand takes over and nuiance is lost. (You can say IM has it&#039;s own shorthand, but that’s in the individual words, not the overall thoughts of a sentence. If I said something on IM that was confusing, at least I have far more room to explain myself, not to mention the issue of immediacy it offers, unlike Twitter. Another issue perhaps for another time.)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The apps available are popping up everywhere. I generally try everything that comes out once just to see if I like it, then I move on. Funny thing is I find now that I use Twitter online for messaging but more often than not, use Twhirl and other desktop apps for the features Twitter lacks. (Like when it comes to followers or tracking, etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agree.  ;-p  Late to the comment party, so here goes. </p>
<p>Seems like two issues at work, the quick-hit nature of a Twitter update and the apps used to scan them all.</p>
<p>Tiwtter by it’s nature forces changes in the way people write about what they think. At times, it’s great, at others, shorthand takes over and nuiance is lost. (You can say IM has it&#39;s own shorthand, but that’s in the individual words, not the overall thoughts of a sentence. If I said something on IM that was confusing, at least I have far more room to explain myself, not to mention the issue of immediacy it offers, unlike Twitter. Another issue perhaps for another time.)</p>
<p>The apps available are popping up everywhere. I generally try everything that comes out once just to see if I like it, then I move on. Funny thing is I find now that I use Twitter online for messaging but more often than not, use Twhirl and other desktop apps for the features Twitter lacks. (Like when it comes to followers or tracking, etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shari</title>
		<link>http://whitneyhess.com/blog/2008/07/14/tweetdeck-stream-of-consciousness/comment-page-1/#comment-2022</link>
		<dc:creator>Shari</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 06:10:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whitneyhess.com/blog/?p=203#comment-2022</guid>
		<description>I completely disagree. 

Before TweetDeck added the url shortening upgrade today, I had both Twhirl and TD running together so I could read from one and tweet from the other. Now, I think Twhirl will stay closed for a while.

The full TD screen is super easy to dip in and out of. Alt+Tab. Check in, check out. What&#039;s nice about the full screen is reviewing your topics of choice (see below) and the all tweets screen at a glance.

Many users, like yourself and the other posters, prefer a single column. The second most popular request on TweetDeck&#039;s feedback forum is to develop a single column view with tabs. Go vote! You can make it happen.

Another upgrade, currently in process, introduces a pop-up window to show new tweets, Twhirl style. 

Grouping might be handy if you have friends and family, or news feeds, that are clearly distinguishable - but I think you&#039;re right, in general, the chaos of consciousness is part of the value. I haven&#039;t attempted to use this function.

My favorite new feature is a dedicated column on a topic (not a group, a topic) of your choice. Do a Summize, er Twitter, search on keywords of your interest, and suddenly you&#039;re following a conversation - without the hassle of your browser! Interested to see what people have to say on TweetDeck the day before you publish your post? Create a column for a Summize TweetDeck search. This feature, I love. 

Another thing I like about TweetDeck: it does a better job of introducing me to people. The pictures are bigger and the profiles are easy to read. It&#039;s more personal. 

Remember, it&#039;s only a beta. Vote for your improvements by following the link below. Let&#039;s specify the user goals. 

http://tweetdeck.uservoice.com/pages/general?referrer=popin</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I completely disagree. </p>
<p>Before TweetDeck added the url shortening upgrade today, I had both Twhirl and TD running together so I could read from one and tweet from the other. Now, I think Twhirl will stay closed for a while.</p>
<p>The full TD screen is super easy to dip in and out of. Alt+Tab. Check in, check out. What&#8217;s nice about the full screen is reviewing your topics of choice (see below) and the all tweets screen at a glance.</p>
<p>Many users, like yourself and the other posters, prefer a single column. The second most popular request on TweetDeck&#8217;s feedback forum is to develop a single column view with tabs. Go vote! You can make it happen.</p>
<p>Another upgrade, currently in process, introduces a pop-up window to show new tweets, Twhirl style. </p>
<p>Grouping might be handy if you have friends and family, or news feeds, that are clearly distinguishable &#8211; but I think you&#8217;re right, in general, the chaos of consciousness is part of the value. I haven&#8217;t attempted to use this function.</p>
<p>My favorite new feature is a dedicated column on a topic (not a group, a topic) of your choice. Do a Summize, er Twitter, search on keywords of your interest, and suddenly you&#8217;re following a conversation &#8211; without the hassle of your browser! Interested to see what people have to say on TweetDeck the day before you publish your post? Create a column for a Summize TweetDeck search. This feature, I love. </p>
<p>Another thing I like about TweetDeck: it does a better job of introducing me to people. The pictures are bigger and the profiles are easy to read. It&#8217;s more personal. </p>
<p>Remember, it&#8217;s only a beta. Vote for your improvements by following the link below. Let&#8217;s specify the user goals. </p>
<p><a href="http://tweetdeck.uservoice.com/pages/general?referrer=popin" rel="nofollow">http://tweetdeck.uservoice.com/pages/general?referrer=popin</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathan Rice</title>
		<link>http://whitneyhess.com/blog/2008/07/14/tweetdeck-stream-of-consciousness/comment-page-1/#comment-2013</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan Rice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 13:56:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whitneyhess.com/blog/?p=203#comment-2013</guid>
		<description>Although I am a big fan of the possibilities of Air and what it can do. For example I love Nike&#039;s running experience with Ipod. And maybe that is the point. Combining tweets into a desktop application simply is not a good experience - or at least I have not seen one. Rather see them come and go on my Blackberry so I can wander in and out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although I am a big fan of the possibilities of Air and what it can do. For example I love Nike&#8217;s running experience with Ipod. And maybe that is the point. Combining tweets into a desktop application simply is not a good experience &#8211; or at least I have not seen one. Rather see them come and go on my Blackberry so I can wander in and out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan Wolk</title>
		<link>http://whitneyhess.com/blog/2008/07/14/tweetdeck-stream-of-consciousness/comment-page-1/#comment-2001</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan Wolk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 21:28:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whitneyhess.com/blog/?p=203#comment-2001</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ll see your double agree Leis, and raise you one;)

I downloaded Tweetdeck after hearing a couple of &quot;power users&quot; praise it.

Looked at it for about 5 minutes and discarded it, for all the reasons you mention.

I can&#039;t fathom following thousands of people the way some others do. (If nothing else, my real friends tweets would sink to page 4 in a matter of minutes!)

Tweetdeck takes up too much real estate. It&#039;s not easy to classify people without overlap (and don&#039;t get me started on the whole Plaxo &quot;Friend or Business&quot; thing) and the functionality seems well-intentioned, but ultimately pointless, since you&#039;re getting the same number of tweets, only in different places on your screen.

The beauty of Twhirl is that it sits in the background where I can ignore it or check it, depending on how busy I am. Twhirl (and its predecessor, Snitter) are what made Twitter work for me in the first place.

Very nice dissection of the app, btw.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll see your double agree Leis, and raise you one;)</p>
<p>I downloaded Tweetdeck after hearing a couple of &#8220;power users&#8221; praise it.</p>
<p>Looked at it for about 5 minutes and discarded it, for all the reasons you mention.</p>
<p>I can&#8217;t fathom following thousands of people the way some others do. (If nothing else, my real friends tweets would sink to page 4 in a matter of minutes!)</p>
<p>Tweetdeck takes up too much real estate. It&#8217;s not easy to classify people without overlap (and don&#8217;t get me started on the whole Plaxo &#8220;Friend or Business&#8221; thing) and the functionality seems well-intentioned, but ultimately pointless, since you&#8217;re getting the same number of tweets, only in different places on your screen.</p>
<p>The beauty of Twhirl is that it sits in the background where I can ignore it or check it, depending on how busy I am. Twhirl (and its predecessor, Snitter) are what made Twitter work for me in the first place.</p>
<p>Very nice dissection of the app, btw.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Meryl Steinberg</title>
		<link>http://whitneyhess.com/blog/2008/07/14/tweetdeck-stream-of-consciousness/comment-page-1/#comment-2000</link>
		<dc:creator>Meryl Steinberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 21:15:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whitneyhess.com/blog/?p=203#comment-2000</guid>
		<description>Another good analysis.  I see Twitter as a ticker tape -- a place to get info and feel the pulse of what it going on amongst a variety of different groups of people who share my interests (and some who don&#039;t).  Liked TD at first, then lost interest for same reasons you describe.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another good analysis.  I see Twitter as a ticker tape &#8212; a place to get info and feel the pulse of what it going on amongst a variety of different groups of people who share my interests (and some who don&#8217;t).  Liked TD at first, then lost interest for same reasons you describe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Merrill</title>
		<link>http://whitneyhess.com/blog/2008/07/14/tweetdeck-stream-of-consciousness/comment-page-1/#comment-1996</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Merrill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 15:25:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whitneyhess.com/blog/?p=203#comment-1996</guid>
		<description>Nice post, Whitney.  I agree with you on almost all counts.  I&#039;ve been using TweetDeck exclusively for a week now, and haven&#039;t found many benefits over Twhirl.  As you mention, having to now check multiple streams is a net loss in productivity.

That said, I think a simple UI change could turn things around.  If the groups were tabbed (or buttoned, a la Twhirl), you&#039;d need far less real estate and would have a nice way to reduce the chatter *when necessary*.  For example, I have a regional group that really helps me follow a conversation among local Twitterers.

Anyway, keep up the good work!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice post, Whitney.  I agree with you on almost all counts.  I&#8217;ve been using TweetDeck exclusively for a week now, and haven&#8217;t found many benefits over Twhirl.  As you mention, having to now check multiple streams is a net loss in productivity.</p>
<p>That said, I think a simple UI change could turn things around.  If the groups were tabbed (or buttoned, a la Twhirl), you&#8217;d need far less real estate and would have a nice way to reduce the chatter *when necessary*.  For example, I have a regional group that really helps me follow a conversation among local Twitterers.</p>
<p>Anyway, keep up the good work!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Leis</title>
		<link>http://whitneyhess.com/blog/2008/07/14/tweetdeck-stream-of-consciousness/comment-page-1/#comment-1994</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Leis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 13:46:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whitneyhess.com/blog/?p=203#comment-1994</guid>
		<description>Double agree. You have to respect the real estate you&#039;re taking first and foremost. I&#039;ll really have to check out TweetDeck now!

Who is that dashing man giving @mediajunkie a hard time? :)

Thanks for another good read.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Double agree. You have to respect the real estate you&#8217;re taking first and foremost. I&#8217;ll really have to check out TweetDeck now!</p>
<p>Who is that dashing man giving @mediajunkie a hard time? :)</p>
<p>Thanks for another good read.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: andy piper</title>
		<link>http://whitneyhess.com/blog/2008/07/14/tweetdeck-stream-of-consciousness/comment-page-1/#comment-1989</link>
		<dc:creator>andy piper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 07:54:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whitneyhess.com/blog/?p=203#comment-1989</guid>
		<description>I have to say I completely agree. To me, Twitter is a stream to dip in and out of and I don&#039;t want it taking over my desktop. Some great analysis here Whitney.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to say I completely agree. To me, Twitter is a stream to dip in and out of and I don&#8217;t want it taking over my desktop. Some great analysis here Whitney.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.784 seconds -->

